Considering that there won't appear to be any "official" Load Data in existence for this Load, can a few of you give a starting point with this mix and factors to think about when working this Load up?
I have employed H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i use it. There usually are not a lot of cartridges that I utilize it for as I look always to gravitate to other powders. On the other hand, I can't declare that it doesn't operate. It is simply that Various other powders work greater for the given cartridge. By way of example, within the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic velocity and really fantastic groups with Nosler one hundred forty AB. Having said that, RL19 was marginally far better in precision, though the velocity was nearly identical.
This is amongst the most significant good reasons reloaders are admonished to employ new data only; and to start very low when you get a brand new great deal of powder. You don't truly know (Unless of course the organization informs you so) that the new lots of powder was even manufactured at the exact same manufacturing facility since the powder you obtain a number of years in the past.
Operate your load up with the particular powder (sc or common) and whole lot you are applying while. Same burn off charge doesn't mean it will eventually behave "particularly" the identical. I have seen around one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.
Yup or it is not going to operate effectively. And since the OP has a load applying Varget I would check out to locate another person to trade with. Might come up with a win get circumstance.
It is really probable that no even further dialogue is required, by which case we endorse setting up a completely new thread. If however you feel your response is necessary you may however do this.
i've utilised both equally and made use of the exact same expenses and also have not been capable to notify any noticable dissimilarities with performance. the SC version meters a little smoother is about all. any feedback??
Chances are you'll both: one) Proceed and have the objects outlined down below quickly removed from your shopping cart:
dioni.a.312 explained: In my encounter the only real actual difference is that the shortcut meters superior via reloading devices. Once It truly is loaded theres no purposeful big difference. I have read which the shortcut might have a little little bit faster burn up amount but it seems insignificant. Click on to develop...
Why would I mention this? What exactly is my level? I'm not sure that there's a serious valid point other than what is preferred with most hasn't been common with me in any way in h4831 vs h4831sc these conditions. Do I just Possess a powder jinx or some thing? In order to teach you how ridiculous I actually am, tomorrow I am assortment screening a good friends new .
This is an older thread, you might not receive a reaction, and will be reviving an old thread. You should think about making a new thread.
Sure, You should utilize exactly the same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, even so the SC Variation may help you get a little bit more in cases in which you are maxing out circumstance volume Using the common powder before reaching force limits.
However IMR 4831 and H4831SC are different powders, you can find that in many occasions, exactly where one of these is mentioned another are h4831sc going to be too. Also, you will discover there is a fairly steady marriage among them with reference to listed loads.
This looks as if a good spot to divulge somewhat more facts on Hodgdon, H4831 especially...I the moment experienced a pound of H4831SC sit on the shelf for several h4831sc load data several years. It absolutely was purchased prior to Hodgdon started publicizing the "Excessive" line of powders, of which the H4831s are an element.